<body>

A Little Person

Michelle Nguyen
Harvard College '13
National Junior College, Singapore '08
Trung Vuong Secondary School, Vietnam '04
Loves shopping, eating and gossiping
Email : blackreds1113@yahoo.com
Facebook: Michelle.Nguyen



Follow Me

Plurk.com




I Follow

♥ Click ♥





Categories

♥ Around The Web
♥ Book Review
♥ Fuck My Life
♥ Harvard Life
♥ People I Love
♥ Rants
♥ US Application Stuff
♥ Writing & Snarky Commentary


I Read


Magazines
Vanity Fair
The Economist
TIME
The New Yorker
Webpages
BBC
The New York Times
TED
Books
Faith of My Fathers - John McCain
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot - Ashley Gilbertson
The Forever War - Dexter Filkins
Dispatches From The Edge - Anderson Cooper

I Watch



Archives

April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
July 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010


Credits

Designer: Agnes & Yours Truly
Base Code: Tammy
Image: Enakei
Image Host: Photobucket




Sunday, July 26, 2009

My Petite Life ♥

US College Application Advice 3: The Interview(s)


I know, i'm putting off writing the arguably most important, most anticipated piece on the personal essay. But hey, if the goal is to create a perfect application (perfect as can be anyway, since no one is perfect, including you. Yes, strange as that may sound), then no single part can be neglected. Remember, everything you've written or said, directly or otherwise, to the adcom will be taken into consideration while they attempt to conjure up an image of you.

I've written a recap of all the interviews i went for during the last application season on Facebook, so please search through all my notes if you want to read them. Keep in mind that i have a flair for the dramatic, so don't take everything i wrote too seriously. Haha. All the details DID happen (i'm not schizophrenic yet), but more often than not i exaggerated their level of screwdom. I don't know why. Maybe i'm just naturally a pessimistic person who sees the glass as half empty.

1. Be Patient! The school will contact you if there's an alumni interviewer available.

For Singaporean applicants: Yes, you will have a face-to-face interview for like 90% of schools, especially the high-profile ones. Rejoice! Or, be very afraid.

For Vietnam-based Vietnamese applicants: Increasingly, more face-to-face interviews are offered for you. Sometimes you'll have to settle for a phone interview, which can be a pain if you TOEFL listening isn't too good, or if your interviewer has a funny accent. We'll come to that soon.

For Singapore-based Vietnamese applicants: Very Important: Notify the schools where you will be during the interview phase (for ED round: November-ish, for RD: anytime from Jan-early March, even December if you submitted your stuff super early). For instance, if you indicated your mailing address as Singapore in the common app, schools will automatically assume that you'll be having an interview in Singapore, and if you wait until after you get the interview assignment to ask for an alternative interview in a whole other country, there might not be one. So then you'll either have to settle for a phone interview, which sucks for some of you, or no interview, which sucks for everybody. Princeton has interviewer(s) in Vietnam, but i did a phone interview because i was assigned a Singapore-based interviewer. I have a feeling i might have enjoyed a face-to-face interview more. Learn from your (friendly) senior's mistake! Columbia, on the other hand, only offers interviews in the country that you go to school. So you will either have one in Singapore, or none at all, even though there are interviewers in Vietnam. Strange, i know.

The bottom line is, please don't harass the colleges you're applying to with a million emails or phone calls every day, asking why oh why you haven't heard about an interview yet. Be patient, and things will come to you!

Once the interviewer contacts you, however, it's your responsibility to (nicely, please) remind him/her of your appointment. People do forget, and they'll appreciate a friendly nudge once in a while. But again, don't obsess and hover. Very off-putting.

Now Harvard is tricky business (for Vietnamese applicants. Singaporean peeps need not worry. They will contact you.), because it's stipulated that you email the school for a list of available interviewers in your country, and then you have to contact them and schedule an interview yourself. The procedure is on its website. So email early, and if you don't get a reply within 2 weeks, email again. From personal experience, Harvard answers email the slowest, if at all, and their emails sound like they're written by autobots, so don't hesitate to annoy them until they give you an answer. Ha! One last thing, please, please make an effort to schedule an interview with Harvard. Harvard takes interviews very seriously, and from the statistics that only about 25% of Vietnamese applicants to Harvard bother to have one, apparently we don't take it seriously enough. The number of interviewers in Vietnam is very small, and they're also very busy people, but do try to meet them if you're serious about Harvard. As far as i know, all the people who have ever gotten in had interviews. I contacted my interviewer, and two months and about 8 emails later, i finally got to meet him. So it's not easy, but totally worth it.

2. Do colleges interview everyone?

Yes, to their best ability. Generally colleges try to interview all their candidates if there are interviewers available in that area. If an interviewer isn't available, they'll try to give you a phone interview, or even a Skype interview (technology is a wonderful thing). Worst case scenario, they can't give you an interview at all, but will tell you either on their website or via email that it doesn't affect your admission decision. Just believe them and relax, because there's nothing you can do anymore.

There are all these stories about how colleges will go out of their way to interview "more promising" candidates, even if they say that no interview is available in this particular region. To be honest with you, i don't know how true this is. It sounds logical, but i don't know anyone who actually went through these things. No interview means no interview, simple as that. Case in point: I didn't have any interview for Dartmouth & Columbia and were accepted. So be happy if you do get an interview, but don't be sad or stressed out if you don't. They will just evaluate you based on all the other materials that they have.

3. Does who my interviewer is matter?

I don't think so. Sometimes the number of interviewer is so small (like 1 or 2) that they'll just randomly assign you. Other times, the alumni committee tries to assign you to someone who shared your academic and/or extracurricular/personal interest, just so you guys will have something to talk about. My Yale interviewer majored in Political Science (my indicated major), so did my Princeton phone interviewer & my assigned Columbia interviewer. My assigned Singapore-based Harvard interviewer was an NJC student (amazing, right? We ended up having a phone chat, not really admissions-related), and my assigned Dartmouth interviewer is a Vietnamese. Of the 6 interviewers i got, two are in their late 20s-early 30s, 3 are middle-aged and 1 is much older. I don't know about you, but i don't see a whole lot of nuances there. They just gave me who they think would work best as my interviewer. Please ignore the kids who go around boasting that they have Mr. General Director of this particular company as their interviewer.

4. How important is the interview?

Depends. Please check CollegeBoard.com where the schools indicate how important interviews are to them. Some, like Harvard and Yale, take it rather seriously. For others, the interview is mostly just an informal venue for students to learn about the schools from someone who went there, almost like a marketing strategy, even. I'm not a believer of the whole "interview is NOT important at all" theory. If it's not, then why bother with it at all? The interview report is like another piece in the puzzle that says "You". It will help the adcom know more about you as a person, what you're passionate about, how you interact with another human being, etc. US colleges are trying to admit a person, not a study bot designated with mere numbers, so they actually are interested in knowing more about you.

5. How do i prepare for a face-to-face interview?

+) Do i bring along a resume?
Only when asked. Most of the times, interviewers only know basic information about you and that helps them remain neutral (to the best of their ability anyway). Don't come with your GPA/SAT score tattooed across your forehead in a bid to impress. That will most likely just backfire. They actually don't want to know those numbers. They want to get to know you. Besides, how annoying are those people who work their stellar SATs/GPAs into the conversation within the first 5 minutes?

+) How do i dress?
Depends on where your interview is held. At an office, and you should be rather well-dressed in business-casual attire, lest you feel and look out of place. For guys, i don't think you need to go all out with a vest and tie and everything, but that could be my personal bias. For girls, pants or skirt with a shirt or a nice top is fine. No revealing stuff, please :| If the interview is taking place at a coffeehouse, or the interviewer's home, then you should just wear something a little more casual. It's quite awkward when you outdress your interviewer. Imagine him in jeans and t-shirt, and you in a business suit. Do wear something comfortable, because you don't want to twitch and turn and adjust your bra strap constantly during the interview. Oh, one reminder for guys: zip your pants! OK i'm done :)

+) During the interview?
Just relax and be yourself. These interviewers are just trying to get to know you, not bite off your head, so no need to be tense and obsessing over your every word. Do have a list of questions and prepared answers, but don't come across as too rehearsed, or like you're trying to rake your brain to remember every word you've written.
Be friendly, but also be professional. I've heard a story about a girl blatantly flirting with her interviewer... Maybe it's just me, but that is not cool! Try to keep it in your pants for the one hour. Seriously, don't be that desperate.

One last thing: Don't be late. Some of them note this down. You don't have to be early (although that can't hurt), but please don't be late. Throw your Parisian etiquette out the door for the day. Remember too that these people might have actual, more important business appointments to keep, and they don't need you making their day worse by screwing up their schedule.

6. How do i prepare for a phone interview?

Phone interviews are usually shorter than direct ones, because it's harder to establish a bond over the phone i suppose. The questions and answers are more straight forward & to the point. One good thing is that you may have your papers and cheat sheets spread out in front of you, so those "Why did you choose this college?" questions mayn't seem so hard anymore. But again, try not to sound like you are reading off your note (even though you actually might be). Spontaneity makes the interview more human, and also more interesting. Nobody likes a robot, is what it comes down to.

Basic preparation should be had: a phone that works, a quiet place where no one can disturb you (you do NOT want your mom storming into the room screaming at you because you've left your clothes out to rot for a week). Speak clearly, and slowly if you worry that the interviewer might have a hard time understanding you. Don't hesitate to ask him to slow down & speak more clearly too if you can't hear him. Don't be embarrassed about this kind of thing. They understand :) Take a deep breath, and like anything else, don't be late!

7. How long should an interview last?

It totally depends on your interviewer and his schedule, actually. My phone interview with Princeton lasted about 30 mins (before it got too awkward and we both couldn't take it anymore. Haha. Ok i kid!), with Yale 40 mins, and with Harvard 1 hour. So there's really no formula as far as i'm concerned.

Don't try to stretch an interview just because you've heard that long interviews are more desirable by asking really weird, unnecessary questions. The interviewer might end up having to ask you to leave (because he really has to do other things), which is even more awkward. I suppose there are always those interviews that go on for hours because the people involved totally click, and at the other end of the spectrum, the shotgun 15-min interviews. The admission outcomes for these people have been mixed (the interviewer may like you immensely, but that's not enough for the adcom), so really, don't worry too much. FYI, when asked, "Do you have any question for me?", i had one question for my Yale & Princeton interviewers, and none for my Harvard one. Granted, we already talked about Harvard throughout the interview, but the point is that the interview should flow smoothly, and you shouldn't feel forced to ask them questions because everyone told you that you HAVE to in order to show interest. If you have shown interest during the interview itself, then there's no need to bother them with some lame ass questions which you obviously prepared at home just for this moment.

8. How many interviews will i have?

Usually, one for each college (if it does interview you at all). Very rarely, you'll be asked for a second interview, which either means your first interview was inadequate (somehow one important question was left out or something), or the adcom is on the fence about you and would like to have another chat with you to finalize their decision. What do you do? Prepare for the interview and be on your best behavior of course. Sometimes the 2nd interview will be conducted by the adcom themselves, so you'll know that you're directly being scrutinized by the people who will decide on your app.

9. Should I google my interviewers?

Probably, just so that you may be prepared for where they're coming from. Sometimes you get a very high-profile interviewer, articles on whom will pop up as soon as you type his name into Google, but more often than not they're pretty normal people. If your interviewer falls into the former category and you've read everything there is to read about him online, please don't appear as though you've known his personal and professional history like the back of your hand in the interview. It's creepy. If he's introducing himself & where he went to school, just nod along as if it's brand new information. However, if you happen to have read and like a piece of academic writing he authored, feel free to express your admiration and such. Again, keep it to an acceptable level because it's kinda weird when people get all jumpy and squealish when talking to you.

Labels:



Michelle: Auf Wiedersehen!

7/26/2009 12:11:00 AM

2 comments / Post a Comment
View this post only
Home



Wednesday, July 22, 2009

My Petite Life ♥

US College Application Advice 2: Useful Websites


Ditch US News and Rankings, please. Are you seriously just going to pick the first 10 evenly-ranked schools and call it a day? I know it's hard to choose schools when most of us have never been to the US before and won't have a chance to visit prior to applying, which is why these website come in handy.

College Prowler
Students' Review
These websites contain pretty candid reviews of colleges based on many aspects ranging from Academics, to Housing, to the quality of Boys & Girls. When i was making my college list last year, i swore by College Prowler. I don't know if that's the best strategy, but i thought it was better than nothing. You'll find a lot of stereotypes and contradicting viewpoints there, so ultimately it's up to you to make your decision.

There are also a couple of short video reviews here on Youtube: TheU.com (pretty funny but not very helpful to people who are at the absolute starting point).

And then of course we have the popular forums:
College Confidential
VietAbroader
The first website is a wealth of information, as well as a minefield of crap opinions & baseless mudslinging by students of rival colleges. If you know how to search for and filter information, you're going to love College Confidential. I don't think VietAbroader needs any introduction. The most important thing is that you have to do your research in the forum well before creating a new thread & annoying your otherwise very helpful and nice seniors with questions like: "What is SAT?", "How did you guys get your scholarship?". Nobody likes someone who expects to be spoonfed, who wants to be admitted into a top school with a good financial aid package but does not want to take some time off their very busy social schedule to do some reading.

I believe in making a good college list that contains schools you think you'll be happy at. This sounds a little ironic coming from someone who's going to a place that was never even in her college list, but let's not talk about that now. Many Vietnamese students choose their schools based on ranking, but i don't think that number alone is the be all and end all of college selection. College is about learning, yes, but it's also where you'll be spending the next 4 years of your life, so choose very wisely. The US has about 3,000 colleges, each one different from the next, so there are a lot of good, suitable options to choose from. Do you want single-sex schools, or co-ed ones? Do you like a school located in a bustling metropolitan city, or sequestered in a rural area? Geography is important, too. Do you like living in the Northeast, the Midwest, or the deep South? All these regions are very different politically and culturally, and IMHO all these factors will affect you. Utah and Idaho are different from, say, Boston or New York, and California is a whole different ballgame. Take as many things into consideration as possible, and you'll stand a better chance at choosing a college that's "just right" for you, even if it might not have been your first choice.

Bonus for dearest blog readers: Not related to college selection, but check out THIS one, my ultimate favorite blog on college admission ;)

Labels:



Michelle: Auf Wiedersehen!

7/22/2009 02:31:00 AM

0 comments / Post a Comment
View this post only
Home



Tuesday, July 21, 2009

My Petite Life ♥

US College Application Advice 1: Standardized Testing


Okay so i've received A LOT of questions on Standardized Testing and i'll attempt to answer them in this post. In my next post (hopefully, if i get around to writing it :P), i'll offer some advice to tackle the personal essay & some miscellaneous application stuff. Please keep in mind that whatever follows is strictly my own opinion. Feel free to disagree with me and/or not give a crap what i think :)

What book should i use to study for the SAT Reasoning Test? Should i go for private tutoring?


The only book i think you guys need to use for preparation is CollegeBoard's Official Study Guide for the SAT Reasoning Test. It's the thick blue book that you can find in any bookstore for less than 40 bucks (in Singapore), or hieu sach Thuat tren duong Ba Trieu (in Hanoi - or you can try those English bookstores along Ly Thuong Kiet street). This is what the one i used looks like, but Amazon tells me the latest one looks like this. But it doesn't matter as long as you use one of them. The book is published by the testmakers and contains REAL test questions so it's most helpful. There's no point practicing on materials that are either easier than the real tests (Kaplan), or harder (Barron's). Plus, the book is so thick that it's going to take a while for you to read from cover to cover (if you manage to do that at all. I know i didn't :|). Once you finish, read again. A friend of mine read the book three times, until he remembers every single question flawlessly and got a 2400, so go figure. Of course he's also extremely talented and good with words, but it can't hurt if you know the test well.

I suppose you can always buy one more book for vocabulary, but i'm not sure how effective in the long run it might be. I bought Barrons' "Hot Words For The SAT" but only managed to flip through 5 chapters. I'm hearing that DirectHit's wordlist is pretty good, so you might want to check that out, but at the end of the day i'm a big advocate of learning words actively via reading & watching stuff, instead of off a wordlist.

I've also heard that Grammatix is a pretty good study guide (from someone who aced the test). I've read its chapter on the essay and it's not bad, so you can give it a try in case it works for you. But for most people, i'd say that the Official Guide is good enough.

I'm not an fan of private tutoring because i think its not worth it, but to each his own. I think you can practice by yourself with the blue book. Review your practice tests carefully and know where and why you're losing marks, and fix it. There's a very clear pattern for the SAT, especially for the Writing and Math sections, and it's possible to beat the game.

How should i prepare for the essay section?

Refer to the Grammatix guide posted above. I'll try to summarize what i can remember. Again, there's no hard and fast rule, but the key is to substantiate your stand (and you HAVE to have a stand. Doesn't have to be a sophisticated one that considers both sides of the argument. Doesn't even have to be one that you'd normally choose in real life. Just choose YES or NO.) with at least 2 well-elaborated examples, or better yet, 3 examples. Feel free to fabricate examples from history and/or literature to make your essay sound more convincing. (The consensus is that historical and literary examples are more desirable than personal ones but there are always exceptions.) Write about 3 sentences for each example, and you'll get at least an 11. Obviously your language must seem somewhat competent, which can be achieved by throwing in a couple of difficult words and varying your sentence structures. Don't write one whole paragraph of simple sentences like: "My dad is an engineer. He works hard. He's a very nice guy." Please, don't. An example of a higher-order sentence: "Having graduated from the University of Transportation one year early, he went on to Germany for a PhD course in diesel engines on a full scholarship awarded by the Communist government." Something like that. I'm very hungry right now so pardon the choppy language. I don't usually write like this (i think).

The problem many people have with the essay is time management. They crank out one shoddy paragraph and the proctor says there's only 5 minutes left, and PANIC! This can be fixed simply by more practice. You have to choose a stand the minute you see the question. Does the past influence the present. Yes or No? Choose right then and there. Don't bother pondering over the question or whatever. Save your profound thoughts and philosophical theories for your midterm exam. Markers have about 2 minutes to give you an essay score on the SAT, and what they look for is a clear stand that is well substantiated with (fake or real) examples. Give them just that. Study the examples given in the blue Official Guide book, and you'll realize the highest-scoring essays are mostly pretty mediocre. The key is to know how to play the game.

Addendum: The SAT essay should ideally contain 300-400 words (go any less and you won't get a high score, 700 word-essays are written by loons) and follow a five-paragraph structure: Introduction, Development (about 2 to 3 paras according to the number of examples used) & Conclusion. Leave 4-5 minutes at the beginning to plan your essay - Planning is crucial so that you know what you're writing about and you don't leave any important points out - and another 4-5 minutes at the end to proofread. You can't underestimate the power of proofreading. That leaves you about 16 minutes to write. Try to fill the whole 2 pages you're given, because i'm told that markers prefer essays that seem long (even though they mightn't be in actuality). Use big words occasionally so that they know your vocab is richer than that of a fifth grader, but do not overuse them! Nothing irritates more than an essay riddled with complex words, 80% of which are used inappropriately. Besides, remember that markers have about 2 minutes to evaluate your essay, and confusing them with too many big words isn't helping your cause. Also remember to write LEGIBLY. Make your points crystal clear, and deliver them well.

When should i take the SAT?

The answer is very simple, when you're ready, and ONLY when you're ready. I don't see the point of wasting your time and money taking the SAT super early "just to get the feel of it". If you want to "feel" the tests, do a timed practice test (and there are 8 in the blue book) and do it honestly. Do all the practice tests published by CollegeBoard, and register for the real test when you feel that you're absolutely sure about the test materials and the way it's timed. They only allow you to leave the room twice for toilet breaks (even though there is a break after each section), but i didn't know that the first time i took the test, so i ended up having to hold my pee (and subconsciously thinking about the bathroom) for the last 4 sections i think. Not something you want to do when you're also trying to squeeze out your brain juice to find the answer to that damn Critical Reading question. Also, ample preparation also helps calm those nerves of yours and that can only help you.

I took the SAT once in May last year (my JC2 year in Singapore or the summer from grade 11 to grade 12 in Vietnam), underprepared, and expectedly i didn't get the score that i knew i deserved. I took it again in October and made it a point to practice as much as possible first. You don't want to tell people that "I have XXXX score, but you know, i didn't study at all", and think that that makes you cool (not studying equals cool for some people). It doesn't. Nobody cares how much you didn't prepare (surely not admission officers), just what score you get in the end. Laugh at the "nerds" and "geeks" all you want, but at the end of the day, they might be having the last laugh standing inside your Dream School and you can cry yourself to sleep at night, wishing that you had been a tad more invested in your SAT test.

Should i take the SAT again? And how many times should i take the SAT?


Yes if you're absolutely sure that you can raise your score, or if something happens on the real test that somehow drastically lowers your score. Don't retake it because everyone else does. If you've done 10 practice tests prior to the real tests and consistently got around 2110-2150, and score 2130 on the real thing, i honestly don't think you should retake. 10 or 20 points more won't make a difference (except for burning a hole in your pocket). Don't retake it because you're hoping that somehow, the Goddess of Fortune will smile upon you on that fine Saturday morning and give you 200 extra points. I suppose there are always those 10 out of 10,000 people who do get lucky like that, but there's a better chance that your score stays the same, or even drops, and you waste your time & money for nothing. My advice is not to take the SAT more than 3 times. We've all heard that story about the guy who took the test 5 times and got his dream score on his last try (do we know this person though?), but IMO by the third time your score has reached a plateau, and if you keep on trying you'll just look score-obsessed and desperate in the eyes of admission officers. Multiple test-taking and its effects is an admission myth, but just put yourself in their shoes for a second, and imagine what you'd feel about a kid prepping for and taking the SAT so often that he might as well put it down as one of his major EC. (Please don't tell me that SAT is "just a 3-hr exam which requires little to no preparation at all". Unless you're a genius, in which case you won't even have to consider taking it more than once.) Do all the timed practicing you need at home, and by the 10th time your score should stabilize.

What's a good score?

It all depends on where you want to apply, and sometimes it varies on a case by case basis. If you're aiming for the stars (i.e. HYPSM what have you), i'd say a fair score would be 2100, which puts you in the middle 50% of all accepted students at these schools. That's not to say that a sub-2100 score would automatically kill your application. No, 25% of accepted students score less than 2100, and you might very well belong in this group. But also remember that you belong in the "Asian" pool (translation: smartest, most gung-ho & also highest scorers in standardized tests). Be safe, and try to break the 700 benchmark for all 3 components of the test.

It goes without saying that "safe scores" get lower as you descend the US colleges food chain. 2000 is a good benchmark for the "2nd-tier Ivies", i.e. Brown Dartmouth Columbia etc, and so on and so forth. (Yes, i mean the little Ivies and all that too. Don't fault me on terminology.)

Don't be afraid to dream big, but also be realistic and know where your limit is. Admission officers do give some leeway for applicants whose first language is not English, but i think it's a bit unrealistic to apply for HYPS with a 1500 composite SAT score. (Unless you're one of those special case applicants - Olympic stars, movie stars, the paralyzed and the orphaned -, but i don't think the readers of my blog are, so moving on...)

How important is the SAT?

Truth is, i don't know. None of us applicants does. The application review process is a big fat myth. But the SAT is (for 99% of schools) a compulsory part of your file, so i'm thinking it must mean something. A lower-than-average score won't necessarily keep you out, and an astronomical score won't catapult you to a place at, say, Yale. But try to get the best score you possibly can, because in this very competitive climate it may not help you, but it certainly can't hurt you.

How did you study for the SAT Reasoning Test?

As i said, i did all the practice tests in the blue book. I bought a couple more books out of panic after seeing my 1st score, but i don't think they helped much (and i never found it in me to read more than 2 chapters :|). I did write crapload of essays to prepare for the Writing section though, because i honestly believed that i could get a 12. In the end, my 11 still stayed 11 but i felt a lot more confident writing my 2nd essay (and ended up writing 700 words - i kid you not - so illegibly. I think that was my downfall.), which put me in a good mood for the rest of the paper. I never doubted that the 800 for Math was within my grasp ONLY IF i could avoid stupid careless mistakes (5x3=12 anyone?) but i never could, so whatevs. Seriously, a >750 is possible for anyone who went through at least 2/3 the lengths of Singapore and Vietnam's educational systems, so please do yourself a favor and triple-check your Math sections before handing them in. I liked the Critical Reading section (giggled audibly twice during the test i think and annoyed the hell out of everyone else in the room. SORRY!) but i know for many, it's like the ultimate challenge. I do think practice makes perfect for CR, and remember to read closely. The answers for all the questions usually are evident within 5 sentences of the identified section.

How many SAT IIs (Subject Tests) should i take? Do i need to take a range of subjects to show "versatility"?

Take as many as your college requires, which usually means 3. Harvard specifically requires that you don't submit 2 Math scores, but most schools don't give 2 hoots what scores you submit, only how high. Feel free to take more subjects if you think you can do well, but please don't do it just because you feel the need to "show a range" (i.e. not sticking with Math & Sciences only like "most other Asian kids" - oh the stereotype!) and end up with a 570 for Literature. A high SAT II score won't necessarily impress, but a very low one might certainly raise an eyebrow or two. Again, benchmarks vary depending on which schools you're going for. HYPSM, and it's best to get >750 for everything. I suppose 730 & 740 are fine (those are my Physics and Chemistry scores respectively btw, keeping in mind that i portrayed myself strictly as a Social Science-major hopeful) but try not to drop below 700 for any subject. The last date you can take SAT II if you're apply early to any school is November, but some schools don't guarantee that scores will reach them in time to be considered, so do your research carefully. I know Yale considers your November test scores though.

I honestly don't know if any SAT II score is considered "more impressive" than the others, but a high score on the Literature test always elicits praises as far as i know because its hard (it's like Critical Reading, only with poems & plays thrown in the mix. I feel dizzy already just thinking about it.) History tests are considered muggable (translation: 2 weeks of hard core memorizing - even if you're starting from scratch - and a good score is yours easily). Math 1 covers easier topics but is harder to get 800 on than Math 2 because the curve is tougher. Language tests are pretty impressive unless it's your mother tongue, then it's pretty lame (obviously).

What books should i use?

When it comes to Subject Tests, there's a wide variety of books to choose from. Again, the stereotype is that Barron's practice tests are harder (and meant for people aiming for 800), Kaplan's easier & Princeton Review's most similar to the real thing. The content parts should be about the same across the board for the math, science and history tests. There's no set content for Lit (well there is, and it's: Prose, Poems and Plays), so you mostly read the book just for fun. I used Kaplan's for my Physics test (because i suck pretty hard at Physics) and it was fine for me, but it might not for you because after all i only got a 730 and i was mighty relieved! LOL. I didn't use any books for the other tests i took (Math 1 & 2, Chemistry) & things turned out fine for me, so i can't give you much advice on this. But then again, i don't think SAT II was a big consideration in my application since i submitted a bunch of Math & Science scores while hoping to major in a Social Science. However, i did consider taking US History & Lit, and found Kaplan's USH and Princeton Review's Lit books to be quite fascinating reads. I was recommended the Lit book by someone online who aced the test and found the book to be the most helpful out of the bunch that she bought, but personally found the tests to be a bit more difficult than the official practice test offered in CollegeBoard's Official Study Guide for Subject Tests. Clearly, choosing SAT II book is an arduous task. Just go with your gut feelings lah (or use a very popular strategy and choose the cheapest ones). If you want reviews of all the books, go to http://www.amazon.com, or http://talk.collegeconfidential.com (The latter is practically a minefield, so be forewarned. Take everything with a grain of salt!)

Is the TOEFL required?

Yes if you're a Vietnamese studying in Vietnam. No if you've studied in Singapore (or any other English-speaking countries) for 4 years. No if you're a Singaporean. That's the policy, but even if you belong in the latter 2 categories, please take TOEFL if you bomb the Critical Reading test (lower than 600 for top tier colleges). Colleges need to know you're able to comprehend written English with ease (you're applying for institutions of higher education in an English-speaking country, hello?) and if your CR score can't show that then you need TOEFL score. If you belong in the 1st category and score extremely well for CR (higher than 650 for many colleges, higher than 700 for Amherst), most colleges waive the TOEFL requirement and hallelujah! You save $150. Check your school policy and when in doubt, email them. I know Dartmouth will tell you that they "recommend" TOEFL (which usually is codeword for "just do it") but feel free to ignore that if your CR score is >700. Many people will tell you that TOEFL is a PASS/FAIL component of your application, which means as long as you crack a certain score, 100 for most competitive colleges, how high you get doesn't matter at all. In their eyes, your command of the English language is good enough and they move on to evaluate other parts of your app. I'm a believer of this theory as well, which of course doesn't mean it's true, but i've heard admission officers from Yale and UChicago say that TOEFL is definitely not required if your CR score is high and other parts of your application tell a convincing story about your English proficiency. Interestingly enough, Harvard is the only school that doesn't require TOEFL score for anybody. Make of it what you will.


How do you study for the TOEFL?

I honestly don't think i'm the best candidate to answer this question. I lived and studied in Singapore's English-speaking environment for four years, so I had to work on my English everyday even if i didn't want to. But i did want to, so that probably helped. For the listening section, i'd recommend watching English movies and TV series without subtitles. If you can't understand them, watch once WITH subtitles, and re-watch with the subs off. For the reading section, i guess you should read more. Read Twilight (or insert the name of your favorite books here) in English instead of the crappily translated version. I know it can be such a chore at first, but gradually you'll realize that nothing beats reading a book in its original tongue. I think that's one of the rewards of learning a foreign language. Hopefully one day i'll be able to appreciate Ricardo Piglia's Plata Quemada in all its Spanish glory. For speaking, practice practice practice! Mobilize your parents, relatives and friends if need be. But don't waste too much time because remember, TOEFL is not that important once you crack 100.

Okay that's all the questions i can think of for now. Feel free to ask me anything you want on this topic by commenting on this post :)

Labels:



Michelle: Auf Wiedersehen!

7/21/2009 04:03:00 AM

5 comments / Post a Comment
View this post only
Home